Author: hatfield13

I woke up this morning to find a bunch of Twitter friends pointing me to a lovely, lovely review of SUGAR AND ICE from Betsy Bird’s Fuse #8 Blog at School Library Journal. Here’s an excerpt:

Kids reading the book will appreciate that the author knows how to speak to more than just ice skating fans. Don’t get me wrong… for fans of ice skating this book is nothing short of a dream come true. If I don’t see a copy of this book in every single ice skater’s gym bag by the end of December I will eat my proverbial hat. But there’s a lot of rich writing at work here, above and beyond the obvious plot elements. It’s got a relatable heroine, three-dimensional villains, a rags to riches element, some convincingly exhausting sequences, and an ending that will probably catch a couple folks by surprise.

You can read the full review here, but do note that the second-to-last paragraph contains just a bit of a spoiler, so you may want to skip that part if you’re the kind of reader who likes to discover all of a book’s secrets on your own.

Other bits of bookish thankfulness this week…

I’m looking forward to this Saturday’s Rochester Children’s Book Festival at Monroe Community College — one of my favorite events of the year!  It’s a high-energy celebration with more than 40 children’s authors & illustrators.  If you’re a Western NY person, I’d love it if you’d come by and say hello!  I’ll be signing my regional historical novels as well as THE BRILLIANT FALL OF GIANNA Z.   I’ll have SUGAR AND ICE bookplates to sign, too, and Lift Bridge Books will be taking pre-orders for the hardcover, which comes out December 7th.

I’m also excited about NCTE in a couple weeks.  I’m participating in a panel presentation on Skype author visits, speaking at the Middle Level Mosaic, and signing THE BRILLIANT FALL OF GIANNA Z. and ARCs of SUGAR AND ICE at the Walker/Bloomsbury booth on Saturday, November 20th.  I’ll post my full schedule with times, etc. when I have it.

I also got an unexpected email from my Scholastic editor this week, letting me know that ARCs of MARTY MCGUIRE, the first title in my new chapter book series illustrated by Brian Floca, will be ready in time for NCTE as well!  If all goes as planned, I’m scheduled to sign MARTY at the Scholastic booth from 10:30-11:30 on Saturday, right after my Walker/Bloomsbury signing.

I’m  feeling some reader-thankfulness, too, this week.  I just finished this book:

SUGAR CHANGED THE WORLD by Marc Aronson and Marina Budhos is a fascinating and compelling work of narrative nonfiction that looks at the history of sugar, or rather, the history of the world as it was shaped by sugar.  Amazing book – and I’ll have more to say about it later on.

I was six years old on the eve of the Ford-Carter Presidential election, and I’d heard lots of talk around the house about voting. The grownups were all discussing who was voting for whom, and why, and I was trying to make my own decision.  Somehow, I’d missed the memo that you had to be eighteen to vote, and so I fully anticipated pulling levers of my own on Election Day.  I wanted to make well informed choices. 

"I’m trying to decide who I want to vote for," I announced one night at dinner.

"Is that so?" my mother said. "And what are you thinking?"

"Well, I’m not sure if I want Ford or Carter," I said, sighing.  "Which one do you think would let me go out trick-or-treating without wearing a coat over my Halloween costume?"  (I was one of those single-issue voters.)

"Hmph. Probably Carter," my father said. "He’s irresponsible."

"Oh good! Then that’s who I’m voting for."  I got up to get a cookie.

"No, no, wait…don’t you see? Ford would be more like a father. He wouldn’t want you to catch a cold. You want someone like that, don’t you?"

No. I didn’t.  I’d had it with giant winter coats swallowing my costumes. Enough was enough, though I think I probably let the conversation go at that point.

I didn’t get to vote that year, and I considered it a great injustice. But this Election Day, I do.  These days, health care and education and social justice have replaced Halloween outerwear at the top of my issues list, but I’m still thankful for the conversations around that dinner table at my house back in 1976 and in the years that followed. They paved the way for me to be aware and involved, and though I still disagree with my dad on plenty of issues, I’m thankful that we talked about things then, and still do.

One of my favorite quotes from the 2008 election season came not from one of the candidates, but from Bob Schieffer, who quoted his mom at the end of the final debate.

"Go vote now.  It will make you feel big and strong."

Due out in February, this is a pretty amazing book – and it’s one that I want to talk about as both a reader and as a writer.

Kate-the-reader/teacher says:

This was the first e-galley I ever read on my iPad, and even though I’m not a big fan of e-readers, I’ve never been so motivated to finish a book on one. DELIRIUM is a major league page-turner, full of romance, conflict, and action. Like Ally Condie’s MATCHED, coming out this fall, it’s about a future world where people’s mates are chosen for them by the government. In DELIRIUM, love has been identified as a deadly disease (Delirium Nervosa!) that is "cured" by a mandatory procedure performed when a person turns 18. What happens to those who resist — including main character Lena — forms the central conflict of this book, and keeps readers turning pages through a whole lot of great twists, to find out how it will all end. My 7th grade HUNGER GAMES fans are going to eat this one up.

Kate-the-writer says:

I knew this book was classified as dystopian and assumed that it was set in the future. Because I’m revising a dystopian novel right now and navigating my way through all the related world-building details relating to everyday life and technology, I pay close attention to the way other authors handle this challenge. As I was trying to figure out the time period in which DELIRIUM was set, I found myself confused by the references to present-day name brands, even though oil was strictly rationed and other elements of the novel (regulator squads, government approved music lists) felt more futuristic. It was only after I’d finished reading that I realized that the novel is actually not set in the future but in an alternate reality of our present times. (Note: I read this one quickly, and it’s entirely possible that I missed a reference to the time frame early on in the text – or perhaps I was just so sure it would be futuristic that I ignored the references. I do things like that sometimes…)

Anyway, as a writer, I find this setting choice fascinating because it allowed the author to manipulate the elements of society that needed to be changed for the story to work without reinventing the world in other areas. Now I find myself wondering how the story might have been different if it had, in fact, been set in the future instead. Would the technology changes and other futuristic elements have detracted from the main conflict and the love story? Maybe. Either way, I think it was an interesting choice, and one that worked beautifully for this particular story. 

I also love the cover design. Look carefully.  See the girl showing through the letters in the text?  When the hardcover comes out, you’ll be able to take off the jacket to see the rest of her face. Aside from being lovely and clever, it’s fitting for the story, too.

1.  A final copy of SUGAR AND ICE arrived in the mail today! 

It is even prettier than the ARC – I just love the care that the Bloomsbury/Walker designers take – even under the jacket.

SUGAR AND ICE, for those who may be new to the blog, is my December 2010 figure skating novel.  My agent, Jennifer Laughran, did a blog interview today where she gave a description of the book that I love:

"SUGAR AND ICE by Kate Messner–Kate just nails the middle school voice–probably because she is a 7th grade teacher. SUGAR is about a small-town ice skating girl who gets scouted by a charismatic Russian coach, plucked from obscurity and thrown into the uber-competitive world of "mean girls on ice." I tend to love "star is born" type stories, "outsider" stories, and funny realistic middle grade too. 🙂

2. In addition to being a cheerleader for my book, Jennifer is doing a Q and A session that’s a great resource for anyone interested in agents – you can read the rest of her interview here.

3. I spent yesterday in New York City and Long Island, meeting with the publicity team for my MARTY MCGUIRE chapter book series coming in May and my editor at Scholastic, and giving a speech to the Nassau Reading Council.  It was an amazing day all around…one that will get its just due in its own blog post when I upload all my photos.  But for now…the Scholastic receptionist:

Okay…it was actually the woman behind Clifford at the desk who helped me, but he made me smile.

4. Earlier this week, Fuse #8 blogger/librarian Betsy Bird posted this review of Kathryn Erskine’s MOCKINGBIRD…which led me to post this response…which led Betsy to post this response to my response.  The end result was a lively conversion with a whole lot of commenters talking about the role of research in fiction, reader and reviewer expectations, voice in writing, and other things. If you read the original posts, you may want to stop by again and check out the comments, which are both thoughtful and thought-provoking.

5. My husband’s celebrating a birthday soon, so we enjoyed a quick overnight in Montreal last weekend. Our last stop on the way  home is always the bakery at Atwater Market for croissants and eclairs for the kids, and on Sunday, the market was decked out in its autumn best.

Hope everyone has a colorful weekend and a Happy Halloween!

Librarian blogger Betsy Bird (Fuse #8 at SLJ) reviewed National Book Award finalist MOCKINGBIRD by Kathryn Erskine this week, and I found myself pondering one paragraph of her review in particular:

The Asperger’s I do not question because that is tricky territory. I do not have a child with Asperger’s and Ms. Erskine does. However, this raises a fairly interesting point in and of itself. When Cynthia Lord wrote the Newbery Honor winning book Rules she made her narrator not an autistic boy, but rather his put upon older sister. This was remarkably clever of her. Then, when you get to the end of the book, the reader finds out via the bookflap that the author has an autistic son of her own. The book is therefore lent a kind of authenticity through this admission. As I read Mockingbird however, I found myself wondering if the author had any personal connection or knowledge of Asperger’s that could lend the book similar authenticity. I read the bookflap and the Author’s Note and came up with nothing. Nada. It was only through the grapevine that I heard the rumor that Ms. Erskine has a daughter of her own with Asperger’s. Now why on earth would the book wish to hide this fact? By the time I reached the end I wanted to believe that the writer had some knowledge of the subject, but instead of including a list of useful sources, or even a website kids can check, the Author’s Note speaks instead about the Virginia Tech shootings. A harrowing incident to be sure, but why avoid mentioning that someone you love has a connection to your main character? It made for a very strange gap. (Read the full review here.)

I love Betsy’s Fuse #8 blog and read it regularly, but I find myself wondering about this expectation…that an author share the details when a story is inspired by personal events in his or her life. I read both MOCKINGBIRD and OUT OF MY MIND, and I do remember thinking that each author must have a personal connection to someone like her main character. I didn’t necessarily expect to turn to the back of the book and read all about it, though.

Maybe it’s my role as an author who’s also a parent that makes me view this differently than some other readers. A whole bunch of things in my books are inspired by my own kids…Zig’s fascination with electricity and gadgets in THE BRILLIANT FALL OF GIANNA Z. MARTY MCGUIRE’S propensity to fall into ponds when she’s catching frogs. Claire’s love of figure skating in SUGAR AND ICE.

When I wrote the author bio for the jacket of SUGAR AND ICE, I mentioned that I’m a fan of competitive skating and that I volunteer with the Skating Club of the Adirondacks. The jacket flap doesn’t mention my daughter, who is the actual skater in our house, though the Kirkus reviewer mistakenly assumed I was the mother of a competitive skater. Should I have talked about why she’s chosen to participate in her local skating show but forego the more intense world of competition? To me, those felt like her issues. While I realize that I give up a certain level of privacy by writing for publication, she hasn’t made that choice. And in this situation, we’re just talking about a hobby – not a disability that shapes every day of her life.

I heard Cynthia Lord give a talk once about her choice to write a book that deals with autism, knowing that her family’s story would never be just their story again. Is it a fair expectation? Can an author who has a child with a disability choose to write about a character with that same disability without being expected to talk about his or her own family at conferences and award speeches, in authors’ notes and on jacket flaps?

I understand the argument; as a reader, I love knowing the story-behind-the-story. But some stories belong to whole families. Can an author write a book about a character like Draper’s Melody or Erskine’s Caitlin without mentioning the personal connection? And if the author does choose to share that information, should it change the way the book is judged? If a character doesn’t work for you when you’re reading the book but you later learn the author’s personal story, should that change anything? Or should the text stand on its own, regardless of the author’s connection to the main character’s disability? 

For years, my husband and I have shared an office that is also shared with a treadmill, keyboard, and sometimes violin and saxophone.  It has no door, and while it’s a fine place to answer a few emails or do tax stuff, it’s not conducive to writing when there’s a house full of people.

In the past, when I’ve needed to get writing done on weekends, I’ve packed up and headed to our local coffee shop.  They’re extremely writer-friendly and make a mean latte, but this summer, we decided it would really be great if I had a place to work at home.  After a bunch of planning and a few weeks of work by our awesome contractor/handyman person, I ended up with this.

It’s a perfect writing room, for a few reasons. 

1. You can’t get here from the house without going outside.  It is separate — its own space — so when I’m here, I’m officially "not home."  The first week, my husband couldn’t resist the temptation to come to the window and make faces, but since then, it’s worked out beautifully.

2. There’s no internet. Truth be told, I didn’t plan this, but the wireless doesn’t make it this far, and that’s fine.  I run upstairs for a minute if I really need to do some quick research. But otherwise, the lack of connectivity helps me focus.

3. It’s quiet (triple-insulated!) with a big desk that overlooks Lake Champlain.

4. There are bookshelves.

Bookshelves make me happy.  I’ve started filling these with a few research books, but mostly, this is where I’m keeping books that are important to me — friends’ books and the books that made me want to be a writer. Having great books in the room inspires me, even if I’m not going to read them while I’m working.

5. The new room is free from office things; there are no in-boxes, mail, tax stuff, scanners, printers, marketing plans, old manuscripts, contracts, royalty statements, school visit paperwork, etc. etc.  It’s free of pretty much everything, in fact. When I come to write, I bring my laptop, current manuscript & planning pages if it’s a revision, and tea. That’s all.

I’ve spent some time here lately, working on revisions for EYE OF THE STORM that are due by Thanksgiving, and I’m appreciating it more every day. I still write and revise in all my usual places — the kitchen table after the kids are in bed at night, in the bleachers at my daughter’s skating practice, but it’s also been amazing to have a quiet place to work at home.  Not an office…. a writing room.

Thanks to the always-awesome Flying Pig Bookstore, the 3rd and 4th graders in my school district had an amazing author visit with Annie Barrows this afternoon. She’s the author of Chronicle’s IVY AND BEAN series as well as THE MAGIC HALF with Bloomsbury, all of which are big-time favorites in the Messner house. We hosted the visit at the middle school where I teach, since we have a large auditorium that could fit the kids from both elementary schools, and I had a chance to sit in on her reading!

Annie read from her latest IVY AND BEAN adventure, IVY AND BEAN: WHAT’S THE BIG IDEA? I loved watching kids giggle as the girls tried out a brilliant if somewhat misguided science experiment. Then it was off to the library office to sign books. And sign more books… And more…

Then we sent Annie on her way for a late-afternoon event at Flying Pig. And look what she was driving!

It’s an Ivy-and-Bean-Mobile!

Thanks, Annie, and Chronicle, and Flying Pig Books, for a great author visit today!

One of my former students, a freshman now, came to visit last week.  She had lots to say about high school, most of it positive, but when I asked her what she’s reading these days, she shrugged. "I don’t have time to read with all the homework. We got assigned Of Mice and Men for English, but I only read part of it," she admitted.  "I got a good grade on the test, though."

Two years ago, she was one of my readers…one of the kids who passed books around with her friends. One of the kids who finished a book every few days and came into my classroom asking "What else do you have for me?"  She hasn’t read any books this year.

"Do you want to borrow a really good book?" I asked her.

"That’s okay," she said. "I won’t have time to read it, seriously."

I nodded.  "I’m giving you one anyway."  I reached behind my desk, where I had my copy of this…

Lucy Christopher’s STOLEN isn’t on my classroom bookshelves because as much as I love it, I feel like it’s just a little old for most of my 7th graders right now.  But I knew it would be perfect for my former student.  I gave a quick book-talk… I told her how much I loved this book…how a girl is kidnapped from an airport when she’s about to leave on vacation with her family, how the kidnapper, who is very good looking, drugs her coffee and she wakes up in the Australian Outback, a captive. I told her how beautiful the writing is, and how troubled I was when I found myself empathizing with the kidnapper, just as the main character seemed to be falling for him, too.

"Just take it," I told her, "and keep it until a vacation or something when you have time. It’s okay."

She left, headed home to work on math homework, and I went home, too, a little sad.

On Saturday morning, this note was in my in-box:

OMG, so i started the book you gave me last night at 7pm and COULDN’T put it down! so i finished it at like 3 in the morning, because like if i didn’t finish it, i wouldn’t have been able to sleep. at all. this was such an amazing book!  so, thank you so much for getting me back into reading… 🙂

It made my whole weekend.

But it also made me a little melancholy, wishing there were more freedom for our high school kids to choose the right book at the right time. Is Of Mice and Men the best choice because it’s Steinbeck?  Because it’s considered a classic?  And is there room to talk about student choice in higher level English classes?  I hope so.  Christopher’s STOLEN isn’t a light, fluffy read. It’s full of SAT words.  It’s sophisticated, intense, and thought provoking.  And besides that, she actually read it.